February 2012  << Back  

  Can't open the PDF? Click here for help.

 

 EDITORIAL

Why are there no treatment guidelines for mood disorders and comorbidities?

Raymond W. Lam, MD, FRCPC

Executive Chair, Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT), Mood Disorders Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Sidney H. Kennedy, MD, FRCPC

Depression Chair, CANMAT, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Jitender Sareen, MD, FRCPC

Anxiety Chair, CANMAT, Departments of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Lakshmi N. Yatham, MBBS, FRCPC, MRCPsych (UK)

Bipolar Chair, CANMAT, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Annals of Clinical Psychiatry 2012;24(1):4-5

Mood disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD), are among the most prevalent and burdensome medical conditions. In a World Mental Health Survey sponsored by the World Health Organization, the lifetime and 12-month prevalence rates for these 2 disorders in 17 developed and developing countries1 were 12.5% and 5.6% for major depressive episodes, respectively, and 1% and 0.7% for BD, respectively.2 A recent commentary on challenges in global mental health identified depression as the third leading contributor to the global disease burden; unipolar depressive disorders and BD, respectively, were ranked first and fourth in an evaluation of the global burden across all mental, neurological, and substance use disorders.3 Previous studies have highlighted the enormous unmet need for treatment among persons with mood disorders.4

Comorbidity has been defined as “any distinct additional clinical entity that has coexisted or may occur during the clinical course of a patient who has the index disease under study.”5 This may apply equally to ≥2 physical diseases, ≥2 mental disorders, or the co-occurrence of mental and physical disorders. Comorbidity is prevalent among persons with mood disorders. In developed countries, 62% of persons identified with major depressive episodes also had a comorbid DSM-IV disorder (50% anxiety disorders and 9% substance use disorders) and 72% had a comorbid chronic physical condition (41% musculoskeletal, 33% respiratory, 20% cardiovascular, and 13% pain conditions).6 Similarly, for persons with a lifetime prevalence of BD I, 88% had a comorbid DSM-IV disorder (77% anxiety disorders, 54% behavior disorders, and 52% substance use disorders),2 while in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder study, medical comorbidity was found in 59% of the BD sample.7 The prevalence of multiple comorbidities appears to be even more striking in BD; in the World Mental Health Survey, the percentage of persons with ≥3 comorbid DSM-IV disorders was 19% in those with a major depressive episode6 and in an astonishing 62% of those with BD I.2 It seems clear that psychiatric and physical comorbidity is the rule rather than the exception for persons with mood disorders.

Comorbidity also substantially contributes to the disease burden and economic costs of mood disorders. Numerous studies have shown that comorbidity is associated with greater functional and psychosocial impairment, poor adherence and treatment response, prolonged recovery time, increased risk of suicide attempts and completed suicides, increased utilization of health services, and higher morbidity and mortality.8-11

Since its inception in 1995, the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) has published evidence-based and consensus-based treatment guidelines to inform clinical decisions in the management of both MDD12 and BD.13 These guidelines have been adopted by practitioners, policy makers, regulatory bodies, and payers across Canada, the United States, and several countries worldwide. Along with the CANMAT guidelines, treatment guidelines for mood disorders also have been created by many esteemed groups including, the American Psychiatric Association, the British Association for Psychopharmacology, and the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry.14,15

A frequent challenge voiced by clinicians treating patients with complex mood disorders is that the evidence base to support guidelines is derived from clinical studies involving highly selected patients who are not representative of “real world” practices. In 1 study, <10% of individuals encountered in busy clinical settings were considered eligible for enrollment in a standard, pharmacological efficacy trial.16 More specifically, clinical practice guidelines—for both physical diseases and psychiatric disorders—have been criticized as not being applicable to patients with comorbid conditions.17 However, it also has been recognized that there is insufficient evidence to produce clinical guidelines for the many different combinations of comorbidities.

Although there are few high quality clinical trials to create evidence-based guidelines for treatment of comorbidities, clinicians frequently ask about treatment options for their patients with mood disorders and comorbid conditions. In response to this, CANMAT decided to formulate treatment recommendations that incorporate both available evidence and expert opinion. A task force was formed and a team of authors, led by Drs. Roger McIntyre, Ayal Schaffer, and Serge Beaulieu, has systematically sifted through the dense literature to derive treatment recommendations for a number of psychiatric and physical comorbidities. They have identified the strength of current evidence and highlighted areas where lack of evidence necessitates recommendations based on expert opinion. We believe that their thoughtful work will prove helpful for clinicians and patients and that it will spur more research and clinical trials on comorbidity in order to build the evidence base for future guidelines.

    REFERENCES

  1. Kessler RC, Üstün TB. The WHO World Mental Health Surveys: Global Perspectives on the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders. New York NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
  2. Merikangas KR, Jin R, He JP, et al. Prevalence and correlates of bipolar spectrum disorder in the world mental health survey initiative. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68:241–251.
  3. Collins PY, Patel V, Joestl SS, et al Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature. 2011;475:27–30.
  4. Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, et al. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA. 2004;291:2581–2590.
  5. Feinstein AR. The pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease. J Chronic Dis. 1970;23:455–468.
  6. Kessler RC, Birnbaum HG, Shahly V, et al. Age differences in the prevalence and co-morbidity of DSM-IV major depressive episodes: results from the WHO World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Depress Anxiety. 2010;27:351–364.
  7. Magalhães PV, Kapczinski F, Nierenberg AA, et al Illness burden and medical comorbidity in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder [published online ahead of print November 19, 2011]. Acta Psychiatr Scand. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01794.x.
  8. McDermut W, Mattia J, Zimmerman M. Comorbidity burden and its impact on psychosocial morbidity in depressed outpatients. J Affect Disord. 2001;65:289–295.
  9. Benton T, Staab J, Evans DL. Medical co-morbidity in depressive disorders. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2007;19:289–303.
  10. Rush AJ, Warden D, Wisniewski SR, et al STAR*D: revising conventional wisdom. CNS Drugs. 2009;23:627–647.
  11. Hirschfeld RM, Vornik LA. Bipolar disorder—costs and comorbidity. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11:S85–S90.
  12. Kennedy SH, Lam RW, Parikh SV, et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults. J Affect Disord. 2009;117:S1–S64.
  13. Yatham LN, Kennedy SH, Schaffer A, et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) collaborative update of CANMAT guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: update 2009. Bipolar Disord. 2009;11:225–255.
  14. Davidson JR. Major depressive disorder treatment guidelines in America and Europe. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71:e04.
  15. Connolly KR, Thase ME. The clinical management of bipolar disorder: a review of evidence-based guidelines. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13.
  16. Zetin M, Hoepner CT. Relevance of exclusion criteria in antidepressant clinical trials: a replication study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;27:295–301.
  17. Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Clancy C, et al. Current guidelines have limited applicability to patients with comorbid conditions: a systematic analysis of evidence-based guidelines. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25987.
CORRESPONDENCE: Raymond W. Lam, MD, FRCPC, Executive Chair, CANMAT, University of British Columbia, 2255 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1 Canada E-MAIL: r.lam@ubc.ca